Roman Catholics and Homosexual Hoteliers Find Common Cause

NOW even the homosexuals are complaining about the provisions of the Sexual Orientation Regulations. It seems that the Britain's thriving homosexual tourist market - apparently worth some £3.5 billion an(nu)ally – will no longer be able to cater solely for the rectally prolapsed because to do so would be to discriminate against heterosexuals under the SOR, which will come into force in April. As hotelier Mark Hurst – whose runs a classy Blackpool establishment called ‘Guyz’ – bemoans:

‘Rather than improve gay rights, it will make things much worse. We run a gay hotel exclusively for men.
‘We feel if we were forced to a situation where we had to accept heterosexual people into our hotel, our gay clientele will not behave as naturally as they would now.
‘Many of them would feel more self-conscious. Many of our guests like to just sit on the settee in the lounge and cuddle up to watch a film.
‘They can hold hands and have a little kiss and would behave in a way they may not if they were in a mixed crowd.’

Aww. Of course, the SOR is evidently an assault on the fundamental right to freedom of expression; an unjustifiable imposition of state-morality that, were the morally-vacuous television-transfixed helots who comprise the electorate paying attention, should have sparked major unrest and protests. Melanie Phillips (wo)mans the 50 cal. and blasts some gaping, gory holes in the dogmatic regulations here.